|
|
 |
|
|
by Healing Cancer Naturally © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 & 2008 |
|
Welcome to page 26 of “Why Choose Alternative Cancer Treatment?” continuing the subject On Conventional Cancer Treatmentcontd. from first page Mainstream doctors receive distorted information on alternative cancer treatments. Therefore, you cannot rely on mainstream doctors to recommend the
correct cancer treatment. You must rely on yourself. If you can read ...[The Cancer Industry and World Without Cancer], you will most likely avoid: Being operated on to determine if your tumors are cancerous. The operation has a good chance of spreading cancer cells and is completely
unnecessary because there is a urine test that is as reliable as a biopsy (source: World Without Cancer) and a blood test. Being radiated at, but radiation is usually just a delay tactic and the side effect of radiation is cancer (source: The Cancer Industry). Given
chemo,
which derails your immune system and wrecks your kidneys. If the cancer persists, and it usually does (World Without Cancer by Griffin), your body will require months of recovery before most alternative treatments can help. If
you don't avoid the above course of action, you and your insurance company will spend about $200,000. Consider that one out of four people get cancer, do the math, and you will have a feel for the most significant aspect of the
cancer industry: $$$. Of every 1,000 American women getting mammograms each year between the ages of 40 and 50, 345 will receive false positive results, often with unnecessary
intervention as the result. I think we can take for granted that there cannot be true honesty from providers of conventional cancer treatment. After all, how many would accept these
treatments if they had all the facts? Chemotherapy and radiation do not make the body well. They destroy, they do not heal. The hope of the doctor is that the cancer will be destroyed without
destroying the entire patient. These therapies do kill cancer cells, but they kill a lot of good cells too including the cells of the immune system, the very system that one NEEDS to get well. If a cancer patient survives the
treatment with enough immune system left intact, the patient may appear to get well at least temporarily, but he will have sustained major damage to his body and his immune system. How much better it is to nourish the immune
system directly by the use of natural therapies to assist it in getting you well instead of destroying it by the use of these therapies. Then the immune system itself can kill the cancer cells without any side effects and heal
your body at the same time. I don't trust any doctor anymore. Doctors are too busy to dig into the statistics of cancer treatments, they assume that what they are taught at school or what is demonstrated in the pages
of briefing journals is the best treatment. They cannot afford to suspect that these treatments are only the best for the pharmaceutical companies that influence their 'institutions of higher learning'. The five year survival rates for the major cancers are: stomach - 5%, trachea, bronchus and lung - 5%, breast - 50%, oesophagus - 5%, large intestine -
22%, pancreas - 4%, liver - 2% ... attacking the tumour with the slash/burn/poison version of cancer therapy, and then pronouncing "cured" after the five year survival period has elapsed, has, of course, nothing
remotely to do with the successful treatment of the disease. Patients who die from the effects of chemo or radio "therapy" after more than five years have passed are counted as cured. Being dead or dying does not
exclude one from the figures of the cancer industry's creative statisticians. Over 75% of the oncologists polled said that if they had cancer they would never use the same chemotherapy they prescribe for their patients on themselves
because of the ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity. [O]ne of the most important things I have ever heard was said to me by an oncological nurse. She was a member of an adult college class I was taking in
1989. When she found out I'd been diagnosed with cancer [and] was entering into treatment for lymphoma, she took it upon herself to say to me, unbidden and unasked, "Elliot, YOU have GOT to TAKE CONTROL of YOUR OWN
treatment, or THE DOCTORS WILL TURN YOU INTO A PIECE OF MEAT." Truer words were never spoken! Because that nurse had thought it important enough to say that to me without my ever asking, I took what she said very much to
heart, and I know her words saved me a great deal of grief! Cancer patients suffer from a faulty metabolism caused by a malfunction in the lipid defense system. By repairing the lipid defense system the cancer cannot survive. Of course common chemo and radiation causes further harm to the lipid defense system -- the very system that protects you from cancer! The folks who will READILY ADMIT that they don't understand the cancer mechanism will tell you with their next breath that cancer can be killed with poisons. So can you. Would you trust your car to a so-called mechanic who didn't understand what makes a car work properly? If not, why would you let someone who doesn't understand cancer "fix" your body? The average cancer docs don't know -- they admit it. That doesn't make them bad people, it just makes them unqualified to treat your condition if you have cancer. Don't let unqualified people poison you just because they don't know what else to do.
Always shove aside the words 'Tumor Response' because it is not the factor we need to see. What we need is 'survivability' and that is what you seek but
must often read between the lines of medical literature to find what the odds are. Compare Statistics, Quote from Philip Binzel MD and Lothar Hirneise on the role of tumors as toxin reservoir Almost every patient treated with IL2 (a current conventional cancer treatment) suffered fever, malaise, nausea or vomiting, diarrhoea, sharp drops in
blood pressure, skin rashes, breathing difficulties, liver abnormalities and irregularities in blood chemistry. Rosenberg himself details a number of horrifying case histories, and one in particular where the administration of
IL2 had precipitated amongst other things, vomiting, swollen joints, lung fluid and 'vascular leak syndrome' where blood would ooze through the vessel walls and collect under the skin. "What you must understand, Mr. Gearin-Tosh, is that we know so little about how the body works." The Medical Monopoly
A respected cancer specialist trying to persuade the author to take chemotherapy treatment writes him a warm and friendly letter. In it, he casually remarks: "I am sorry I forgot to mention to you that the best way of administering this chemotherapy is through a Hickman line which can be placed into one of the big veins, and tunneled out under the skin of your chest wall. This then stays in place for the duration of your treatment." Gearin-Tosh comments, "His phrase 'I forgot to mention' makes me paranoid about gradual disclosure, about bad news dripping out. Will there be more? And I saw a Hickman line at the Marsden (hospital): a patient's shirt was open and a rubber tube hung from his chest ... I decline the treatment." Gearin-Tosh's description of the de-constructive interpretation he puts to the carefully calibrated soothing language aimed to coax him into a regime of chemotherapy while hiding its horrors and ultimate hopelessness is worth the price of the book itself. It is a stunning demonstration of why all values and qualities in any society, including technological progress and the struggle to maintain social justice and human liberty, ultimately depend on the honest and accurate use of language. "In the beginning was the Word." And without it there is no salvation. And no physical cure or relief either. Martin Sieff reviewing "Living Proof: A Medical Mutiny," by Michael Gearin-Tosh, who cured himself of a normally deadly form of cancer (0.005 % 3-year survival chance) [C]hemotherapy is basically ineffective in the vast majority of cases in which it is given PROSTATE CANCER is one of the worst areas of chemotherapy abuse, according to Norman Zinner, MD. He
states:"Most men with prostate cancer will die from other illnesses never knowing they had the problem."...There are no randomized clinical trials proving that chemotherapy for
prostate cancer increases long term survival. Au contraire, a 1992 study published in JAMA demonstrated that there was no difference in 10 year survival rate between the men who did nothing at all and those who had treatment.
(Johansson) ...the immune system can hold many problems in check, as
long as it is not compromised by powerful procedures. Guess which system is the most important to you at this time, more than it's ever been before in your whole life. Right - the immune system. Guess which system suffers
most from chemotherapy and radiation. Right again. A 1992 study in Journal of the American Medical Association of 223 patients concluded that no treatment at all for prostate cancer actually was better than any standard
chemotherapy, radiation or surgical procedure. (Johansson) Many surgeons abandoned the mastectomy, yet in the USA over 1,000 women per week are persuaded to part with
their breast, underlying muscles and lymph nodes, but the scalpel spivs omit to tell the victims that the average survival period is around twelve years without the mutilation and three years with it. If the reader agrees with nothing I have said so far, but has less than 100% confidence in the hospital's ability to cure
your cancer, get behind this: follow none of my recommendations. Do nothing: no doctors, no treatment, mainstream or holistic. Go home and live your life. For the majority of cancers, no one can tell you with any authority
that you are doing anything "high risk." To the contrary, doctors have known since 1975 that survival rate with no treatment at all is higher than survival rates with standard chemo/radiation/ surgery. (Lancet, 1975)
If you actually do the research ... it is virtually impossible not to arrive at a similar conclusion: that mainstream
cancer treatment is rarely effective and exists primarily for the benefit of the cancer industry itself, not you. If you go along with their program, it is likely that at some point you
will learn the truth of this reality. For most, that point comes too late. WHO'S WINNING? It's not the results of the "bone scans" or "CTs" which are of crucial importance ... but whether the cancer can be gotten
under control or not. While many of the test methods used by us physicians are certainly scientific, they say nothing about the patient's state of health. Cutting away every and all cells thought to be cancerous, in order to "prevent metastases", as done today, is both
unnecessary and maiming. Either way, the canceration will continue in the area, since the conflict is still unresolved, so it's important to focus entirely on conflict solution
afterwards - something conventional medicine doesn't care about... ”I am providing [links to breast implant and tissue flap sites] in the hopes of lifting a veil of illusion that exists about Allopathic Medicine. Drugs affect the aura a great deal. I have seen dark energy forms in the liver left from drugs taken for various previous
diseases. Hepatitis leaves an orange-yellow color in the liver years after the disease is supposedly cured. I have seen the radiopaque dye used to observe the spine that was
injected into the spinal column to diagnose injury ten years after injection although it is supposed to be cleared by the body in a month or two. Chemotherapy clogs the whole
auric field but especially the liver, with greenish-brown mucus-like energy. Radiation therapy frays the structured layers of the auric field like a burned nylon stocking.
Surgery causes scars in the first layer of the field and sometimes all the way to the seventh layer. These scars, disfigurations and clogs can be healed by helping the physical body heal itself; if they are left distorted, the
physical body will have a much more difficult time healing itself. When an organ is removed, the etheric organ can still be reconstructed and serve to keep harmony in the auric
bodies above the physical body. I would imagine that someday, with more knowledge of the auric field and biochemistry, we may be able to cause organs that have been removed to grow again. I can't imagine going to see a "doctor". I've seen them. They were terrifying and useless and all they did really was
light up with joy and anticipation for yet another country club membership when they diagnosed me and gave me various lengths of time to live, as if they were theater critics predicting the run of a play. The first Lesser-Known Serious Possible Side Effects of Conventional Cancer Treatment/Therapy, among themt Lymphedema.
See also On Chemotherapy, Conventional Oncology (Cancer Treatment) Is Losing War on Cancer, On Mammography, For Anyone Thinking Of Having Mainstream Treatment, On Drugs, Take time to decide-alternative or allopathic, Breast cancer treatment advice, Helping a Loved One With Cancer See the Benefits of a Healthier
Lifestyle, Diet & Alternative Therapy,
|
|
|
Disclaimer • Welcome • Why Alternatives ? • Alternative Cancer Therapy Books
This site depends on your support, and you can contribute to its
maintenance by giving as little as $10.00.
Dedicated to Joyful Healing USE OF THIS SITE SIGNIFIES YOUR AGREEMENT TO THE DISCLAIMER. Paradise Now
|